On Thursday, 13 July 2006, at 15:20:12 (-0400), Jonathan Reed wrote: > I'm not sure how using this method prevents me from keeping the > macros under a version control system. I never said it did. Though version control tends to work best when you don't have multiple copies of the same file in lots of separate repositories.... > I'm also not sure how the copy of the macros in the SRPM is any more > "independent" than the actual source code files in the SRPM. 1. Actual source code files come from an upstream source. 2. They're versioned. 3. They're directly associated with the original package. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej@xxxxxxxxx> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "To turn away and not become another nail to pierce the skin of One who loved more deeply than the oceans, more abundant than the tears of a world embracing every heartache." -- Jars of Clay, "Worlds Apart" _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
