Re: "#include" equivalent in spec files?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On July 13, 2006 12:58:54 PM -0400 Jonathan Reed <jdreed@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think it's poor form to make some random macro package a  requirement to rebuild an RPM.

And how is that different than %include'ing an arbitrary macro file, whose
versioning you know even less of than if it were an rpm package?

-frank

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux