Re: "#include" equivalent in spec files?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 13 July 2006, at 14:54:16 (-0400),
Jonathan Reed wrote:

> Because adding it as a %Source ensures that it will be in the SRPM,
> as opposed to simply listing it as a BuildPreReq, which requires
> that you go get it from somewhere, and makes rpmbuild --rebuild a
> trivial one-step process.

...and creates a new, independent, unversioned copy of these macros in
every SRPM you create or build.  Or that anyone else builds.  That's
even worse than putting them in the spec file.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <mej@xxxxxxxxx>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Love?!  What does *love* have to do with *marriage*?!"
           -- Peter Jurasik (Ambassador Londo Mollari), "Babylon Five"

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux