On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 21:25 -0400, James Olin Oden wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Christian Goetze wrote: > > > > Well, I filed Bug nr. 119286, which got closed out as "wontfix", with > > > the laconic comment: > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From jbj@xxxxxxxxxx 2004-04-07 12:54 > > > ------- Using --prefix to qualify upgrade/erasure ain't the right thing > > > to do. > > > > Well, what _is_ the right thing to do, and how do I selectively erase a > > particular rpm without erasing all of them? > His problem is that the rpm in question has the NEVRAC as several other > rpms that have been installed with a different prefix. So I think his > request is reasonable, albeit it may be difficult to implement, and there > of course may be other issues Jeff is seeing far more clearly than me. > if they actually show up as different headers in the rpmdb then he should be able to figure out which one is which and put that mi.instance() into the ts.addErase() call. -sv _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
