On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 23:11, Kevin Waterson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, "Christopher A. Williams" <chrisw01@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm just surprised at how many people are complaining so loudly about > > having to pay for a service. Sheesh... > > Well, I admin a school network with 600+ workstations, and several servers. > All running redhat, we simply can't afford that sort of money. We will be > looking at SuSe but not debian I think. Does SuSE have a RHN equivalent that they do not charge for? Seriously, I've had so much problem w/SuSE I don't know, do they? If you don't mean RHN, then Fedora will provide you what RHL currently does, plus more. Now it will be a lot easier to have a custom install for you school, maintain your own additional software repositories and provide easy install tools (hint: up2date has yum support) for your users/students/etc. to customize further, if you give them the permission to do so. BTW, the yum config form Fedora includes the K12 LTSP stuff. The first release of Fedora Core is, as I understand it, exactly the code that was to be RHL 10. What's the beef, *exactly*? -- Bill Anderson RHCE #807302597505773 bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
