RE: Fedora vs. RHL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am too new to know about Yum and the others you mention.  

Don't try to read in or out anything.  I talked to Red Hat Sales.  The
man told me that RED HAT will not be offering the demo or basic up2date
service any longer.  Up2date on Red Hat is only available with the
purchase of one of the three enterprise products.  

To me, it would make sense that Fedora would have an up2date even if
they charged a minimal charge, say $30-60 / year.  I am sure that they
are working on updates and debugging products anyway so it would make
sense that it would cost them very little to make them available by
up2date when they will make them available anyway. 
 
Of course, only time will tell.

Buck
  




-----Original Message-----
From: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:49 AM
To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Fedora vs. RHL


At 08:31 9/23/2003, you wrote:
>As per my conversation with a Red Hat salesman yesterday.  It will only

>be available to Enterprise customers.

But (correct me if I'm wrong here) yum, current, and apt-get (especially
if 
run via cron) can take up the slack with no loss in functionality. Yes?
No?


-- 
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list





-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux