Hi Neil, Sane and xsane are both installed from tar.gz. No difference from the last rpm build. We should be off topic now, but however, my LD_ASSUME _KERNEL is fixed and was due to iscan rpm. Once installed, iscan generate a Seg-fault when you launch it, and also when you launch xsane (hope this helps others.). By the way, there is a quite clear quality difference for my EPSON 1250 between xsane and iscan. You can have a look at it here. http://www.fcomfrench.com/tst/iscan.png http://www.fcomfrench.com/tst/xsane.png Thanks a lot for your help and your quick answers. Regards, Philippe On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 19:40, Neil Bird wrote: > Around about 11/09/2003 12:31, Philippe typed ... > > I don't recall seeing the iscan generating better scans than the sane > drivers, and ISTR reading that the recent sane drivers are held to be > better. > > You'll have to read the page; I forgot what I did, but the > instructions are fairly straightforward: download the correct > plsutek_module file to somewhere, unpack it & I think you just > 'make/make install' it. > > -- > [neil@fnx ~]# rm -f .signature > [neil@fnx ~]# ls -l .signature > ls: .signature: No such file or directory > [neil@fnx ~]# exit -- Philippe, Chiangmai, Thailand -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
