My question is : my new customer installed RH9, up2date everything as me, and used xsane or iscan WITHOUT any problem. After comparing our 2 servers, libraries and rpm, our systems looked identical ...
The problem with the latest iscan (last I looked, anyway) is it's not compatible with the new POSIX threading libraries. These can be disabled at boot-time, so maybe there's a difference there.
I had been running the newest icsan on the command line for a while, but not being able to directly import into gimp annoyed me so much I got the latest xsane plustek backend (necessary in order to not blow up some scanners!) and it works a treat, so I think I'll not be returning to iscan now.
-- [neil@fnx ~]# rm -f .signature [neil@fnx ~]# ls -l .signature ls: .signature: No such file or directory [neil@fnx ~]# exit
-- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
