Re: named (bind) problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: named (bind) problems
From: rbragg <redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 14:36:25 -0400
Delivered-to: shrike-list@listman.redhat.com
References: <3EB96C21.7070904@rufon.org> <3EB8E2AE.3080401@no-sense.net> <3EB97607.5060106@rufon.org> <3EB978A7.1080303@rufon.org>
Reply-to: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02

Paul Dorneanu wrote:

An NPTL support defect in the kernel causes bind not to restart on
uniprocessor systems; this bug has been fixed in kernel-2.4.20-9.
uh.... but, I have a dual Xeon with HT also... that makes 4 cpus

I have a single Xeon with RH9 iso install.
My bind is/has been working great since it was installed!
Although I just did the kernel update.

just a note.
Rick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: named (bind) problems
  - From: Paul Dorneanu

References:
- named (bind) problems
  - From: Paul Dorneanu
- Re: named (bind) problems
  - From: Eric Koldeweij
- Re: named (bind) problems
  - From: Paul Dorneanu
- Re: named (bind) problems
  - From: Paul Dorneanu

Prev by Date: Re: bind question
Next by Date: Restarting X
Previous by thread: Re: named (bind) problems
Next by thread: Re: named (bind) problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Centos Users] [Kernel Development] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat Phoebe Beta] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Discussion] [Gimp] [Stuff] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux