Re: Postfix features Was: Re: Help - have I been hacked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 3 May 2003, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:

> > I've seen no valid points as to what postfix does that sendmail can't
> > and I've seen no explanation as to why postfix runs with a higher loading
> > on the same hardware that sendmail does.
>
> It doesn't.

it _does_ here

> The only way to make Postfix run with a higer load than Sendmail is to
> do it on purpose. If you have any proof to the contary, please send it
> to the postfix mailing list (postfix-users at postfix.org).

well as I no longer have a postfix machine thats a waste of time
isn't it now, but your more than welcome to tell them,
P3 733Mhz - 1 gig ram was the box postfix used to be on, with sendmail its
always around 3, with postfix it was setting off our load alarm all
the time which is set on the 15 min avg of 5, it rarely went under it, so
much so we had to adjust the load alarm level to 7


> The people there will be very interested in your test results.

test? it was on production machines.


-- 
-Res

lns01-wick-bne> ipfirewall addb reject all from aol.com to 0





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux