Re: RedHat Linux 9.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey William,

The correct term for linux is "GNU Linux"....haha, none of that 
hurd stuff.

~~Nick

> Jeremy Portzer said:
> > On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 12:59, Glenn wrote:
> >> As to RedHat 9.0 vs. RedHat 9:
> >>
> >> Distinction noted.  Thanx to all who responded.
> >>
> >
> > You've still got it wrong.  There is a space between "Red" and "Hat".
> > The company that makes the product is "Red Hat" or "Red Hat, Inc." and
> > the product name in question is Linux.  Hence, "Red Hat Linux 9."  (When
> > talking about Microsoft Windows 2000, you never shorten it as "Microsoft
> > 2000" do you?  Then why do people insist on doing the same with Red Hat
> > Linux?)
> 
> You need to talk to more computer newbies!  I quit counting the number of
> times someone has asked me about "Microsoft 98" (translation "Microsoft
> Word 97") or "Microsoft 97" (translation "Microsoft Windows95").
> 
> Could be worse, he could have asked "Is this where I talk about Linux 9?".
>  While more technically correct ("Linux" is the product name), it is
> pretty worthless.
> 
> -- 
> William Hooper
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux