Re: RedHat Linux 9.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Portzer said:
> On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 12:59, Glenn wrote:
>> As to RedHat 9.0 vs. RedHat 9:
>>
>> Distinction noted.  Thanx to all who responded.
>>
>
> You've still got it wrong.  There is a space between "Red" and "Hat".
> The company that makes the product is "Red Hat" or "Red Hat, Inc." and
> the product name in question is Linux.  Hence, "Red Hat Linux 9."  (When
> talking about Microsoft Windows 2000, you never shorten it as "Microsoft
> 2000" do you?  Then why do people insist on doing the same with Red Hat
> Linux?)

You need to talk to more computer newbies!  I quit counting the number of
times someone has asked me about "Microsoft 98" (translation "Microsoft
Word 97") or "Microsoft 97" (translation "Microsoft Windows95").

Could be worse, he could have asked "Is this where I talk about Linux 9?".
 While more technically correct ("Linux" is the product name), it is
pretty worthless.

-- 
William Hooper




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux