On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Doug B wrote: > On Thursday 24 April 2003 11:03 pm, Res wrote: > > > > BS, I have no hesitation in taking out entire domains, and do! aol > > for instance, yahoo for another example. > > > I do not speak for RedHat, however I'm sure I speak on behalf of many > > postmasters. > > > > As a subscriber to a Linux list, I expect you like open source software > and the freedom it gives you. You like to take responsibilty for your > own actions. Then why do you censor other peoples email? That's what Why should I let my users have their much treasured privacy invaded by gutter scum nolife leaches who spam ? A great deterant is its about to be an offence under the Aust federal crimes act for any aussie to send spam, do it and you risk jail, and I must say not before time! > blocking amounts to. Do you post those blocked addresses so people > will know what you're doing or is this closed source... done without What I do amounts to the same actions taken by any DNS RBL. > their knowledge? Any postmaster who blocks email should say up front: > WE CENSOR YOUR EMAIL Or maybe " We are NOT spammer friendly" > and list those domains that are blocked so their users can decide if > that is what they want. I personally don't want anyone deciding what And so maybe spammers can collate the list and know what not to use? No thanks. > makes it to my mailbox! I'll take that responsibilty thank you very > much. Well, I hope you run your own mail server, good chances are your ISP uses an RBL of some sort, most do, granted not all though. -- -Res lns01-wick-bne> ipfirewall addb reject all from aol.com to 0
