Re: Bugfix errata?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 21:12:26 +0100 (BST), M A Young wrote:
> >
> > I'm absolutely certain, because a glibc errata has just appeared on the
> > RedHat 9 errata page. I suspect the bugfix policy will be the same as we
> > saw through 8.0, that security holes will be fixed, and other bugs will be
> > fixed if they are serious enough.
>
> Would you call this very popular bug "serious enough"?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76446

Actually, I would, though it isn't my decision that matters here! Also
if it is a matter of adding new hardware configurations to support new
equipment (the bug isn't totally clear on this) the issue is less clear,
though in this case the error message should be clearer.

	Michael Young





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux