Michael Schwendt wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:14:18 -0500, Thomas Dodd wrote:
Would you call this very popular bug "serious enough"? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76446
Seams to have been fixed with redhat-config-network-1.0.3-1 for 7.x systems. http://people.redhat.com/harald/redhat-config-network/
I and probably all those in the Cc field of that report are aware of that. *But* that location is not the official place where customer expects an erratum for Red Hat Linux. It's difficult enough to find this bug report (as you can conclude from the huge number of duplicate reports) and the comment that leads you to the unofficial download location.
As I also added, the problem isn't getting the bug fixed, it's getting it pushed out as an update. That's a process problem, probably due to resource limitation. Hopeful the new fee schedule will allow the need resources to be aquired to prevent that type of problem in the future.
As to dificulty finding it, bugzilla needs better searck capabilities. But once a new bug is marked as a duplicate, the filer get a notice of the previous bug, and can see it for a resolution. Not perfect, but it gets to the fix.
-Thomas
