-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 21:12:26 +0100 (BST), M A Young wrote: > Shawn wrote: > > > Blah, blah, blah. We're all well aware of the cotton'-pickin' > > > arrangement. I paraphrased much of this myself. That's not the point. > > > The question remains: Is Red Hat going to address the bugs in this > > > release with bugfix erratas, or simply roll the fixes forward into the > > > next release of RHL (with its attendant bugs). > > > > I'm fairly certain that they will be addressing the serious issues in > > errata releases, I believe glibc will be one of these. > > I'm absolutely certain, because a glibc errata has just appeared on the > RedHat 9 errata page. I suspect the bugfix policy will be the same as we > saw through 8.0, that security holes will be fixed, and other bugs will be > fixed if they are serious enough. Would you call this very popular bug "serious enough"? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76446 - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+lSk90iMVcrivHFQRAgU1AJ9466yWzXNjAkGixG+F//hlLMdd6gCfWMkx 860LFm3ItZmjSkvaMNouHvE= =pw0S -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
