depends on how you look @ it. To me, it is about "installation", its about presenting arguments that help to justify (or not) the installation of Shrike (or any other RH product). Of course, you could be construed as saying don't use (RH), I for one, am not saying that. I am a firm supporter of Linux (RH being my distro of choice since 3.x). What I am saying (and I think others are as well), is that more thought needs to be given now as to how/when/if we deploy because of the not so competitive pricing of RH Linux. What I'd like to see is general discussion as to how Shrike is worth more (and I like the cost comparisons) than the alternatives. Tom On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 14:49, David Krider wrote: > Jeremy Portzer wrote: > > > How is this related to the installation, configuration, or use of Red > > Hat Linux 9 really baffles me though, Rob. Might I suggest you consider > > an alternate forum for political discussion. (Contact me off-list if > > you need some suggestions.) > > Well, I enjoyed it Rob. > > I say that until someone with an email address that has "@redhat.com" at > the end of it speaks to what is "on topic" or not, then everything but > personal nastiness ought to be allowed (and that's just called being > polite). > > dk > > > >
