Agreed! I like the accelerated releases.. (this ties in with my previous post about seeing the "worth") for certain applications. (desktop users most notably). On the server side, tried and true is a good motto and therefore the enterprise products are a good fit. But, since this is the "shrike" list, I'm mainly concerned with the cost differences between a shrike basic rhn subscription and alternative products and their pricing. Outside of the linux "sector", this change of acceptance of newer versions is good IMHO. Tom On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 14:56, Michael Knepher wrote: > What I would want to see this "accelerated" development of the > "community" version mean is Red Hat releasing "blessed" app upgrades, > e.g., Red Hat rpms of new mozilla or evolution releases, outside of the > standard distro upgrade cycle. Their pronouncements so far have been too > ambiguous to really say what their new process will actually look like. > > > Regards, > > dk > -- > Michael Knepher <limbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >