>>>>> "HP" == Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com> writes: HP> Well, not really. It's 100% breakage here; not a single panel icon has survived. Since the desktop files are no longer in /usr/share/applnk and some of them have changed names, I don't see how there could be another other than complete breakage unless something is supposed to automatically convert things. HP> It's called a "configuration file" because you edit it to change HP> configuration. They're called "defaults" because you can change HP> them. And release notes and documentation are called that because? Can you at least understand why an admin might become exasperated? HP> Sorry for trying to help with your question, Hmmm. I complimented the design, but I questioned the way Red Hat made use of it. Just how much criticism am I supposed to avoid? - J< -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
