Re: > Re: Reasonable KDE menu structure? (Havoc Pennington)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu> writes:
> >>>>> "HP" == Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> HP> All applications install desktop files to /usr/share/applications/
> 
> Well, that explains why every single user has their panel applications
> broken in an upgrade to 8.0.

Well, not really.

> HP> /etc/X11/desktop-menus/applications.menu describes how those are
> HP> assembled into a menu layout.
> 
> I think this is a pretty neat system and certainly solves several
> problems, but the arrogance espoused by giving me an empty "Office" menu
> while koffice is buried under "Less-commonly-used applications" is
> telling.  Already I have been asked more than once why a user's
> favorite applications stay "Less-commonly-used" when they use them
> every day.

It's called a "configuration file" because you edit it to change
configuration. They're called "defaults" because you can change them.

Sorry for trying to help with your question,
Havoc



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux