Edward Shishkin Sunday 14 December 2008 20:17: >> I know you stress this quiet often in your mails. Or is it just your >> focussing for now to get reiser4 mainline? >> Is it not possible to introduce new extended features in reiser4 and >> hide these features vfs? > Yes, it is possible, but, again, those features should implement > some new (optimal, efficient, safe, reliable, etc.) form of data > storage. I have the idea to rewrite reiser4 code to another language (probably D: has clean syntax, has classes and garbage collection) and then to have a demon system in user space where I can experiment to implement sql - database features. My aim is a winfs (Microsoft) like system where you have both a filesystem api and a full featured database. Could reiser4 fit well to my purpose ? As of now all plugin types have to be "hard-formatted" on the partition. You cannot introduce new plugins to an existing filesystem, yes? The first part of my work would be to enable a special place on disk for definitions of used plugins. > Yes, I have pushed some technical concepts of r5 to r4 a year ago.. Here in this mailinglist? Ralph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
