Ralph Ulrich wrote:
> Edward Shishkin schrieb:
>
>> AFAIK they were unhappy with assertions and "coding nits" like
>> if (foo) { bar(); }
>>
> ....
>
>> Eventually akpm said that assertions are okay and guys send
>> cleanup patches against other issues once in a while.
>>
>
> And what are Your plans to get reiser4 in the kernel now!
>
I wouldn't force the events:
there is no hurry, business plans, timelines, etc..
> As of now it seems that brtfs,
> which has nearly the same "hardware" logic as reiser4
> but lacks the whole ground breaking philosophy,
> will get there first!
>
And what? I don't see any problems if someone gets it prior
to reiser4.
> Edward, we are all waiting, what do you need for help?
>
To maintain at least one reiser4 subsystem would be real help..
However, it requires a victim in the person of some student(s),
who is ready to kill the best years by sitting in front of monitor
and studying reiser4 sources..
Do you know such ones? ;)
Edward.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
