Re: A few questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I absolutely agree about compromisng Hans' ability to make bank, and
should have been more clear. I'm NOT AT ALL proposing any sort of
rename or transfer of 'ownership' of the project. It's Hans' baby, and
regardless of what happens, it will remain his baby in my eyes.

I'm proposing that, in his absence, the community comes together and
commits to continue developing and releasing it (and working towards
mainline kernel inclusion). I oppose arbitrary renames and am
absolutely in favor of giving back the proverbial reins (which, again,
to be clear: I have no interest in holding or ability to hold) when/if
he returns, regardless of the trial outcome. I want to use and sponsor
ReiserFS, not some politically correct renamed fork. ReiserFS is what
it is because of Hans, and I don't want it to be something else.

Note that I didn't register the domains. I actually did check them,
but I decided against it. I don't want to do anything that doesn't
have the full, unanimous support of the folks actually doing the
development. Anything I do pertaining to ReiserFS will be posted on
list, and if there's a halfway reasonable problem with any of it, I'll
stop immediately. I want to further Hans' vision. His personal life
has zero effect on the merit of his filesystem design.

I'd happily consider sponsoring further development of the repacker -
if you'd like to hack on it, let me know, and we can work something
out. I'm not able to fund a full-time development effort, but I can
definitely help.

I'll work on getting the source code comments into HTML.

On 3/4/08, Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Christopher Sawtell was kind enough to send me a copy of the documentation.
>
>
> Please note that the image files for the diagrams which are be part of
>  the whitepaper are missing, and that there is a lot of more up to date
>  detailed doco in the source code files.
>
>  If there if more work that would be well worth funding, it would be
>  the proposed real-time re-packer, and the re-integration of the
>  ability to access extended attributes as sub-files of the main
>  data-file. Yes, I do know that 'The Powers-That-Be' don't approve, but
>  it's a brilliant idea.
>
>  P.S. I think we should not yet do anything which would compromise
>  Hans' ability to earn a crust if the current situation turns out to be
>  just a ghastly nightmare.
>
>
>  --
>  Sincerely etc.
>
> Christopher Sawtell
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux