On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 11:20, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > IMO, for production server, it's not worth the effort to move to RH 9 since > it's EOL is April. Fedora might not be the best choice also, at least for > now. This leaves either RHEL or RHPW. > But if they don't have coherent information, people would tend to look > somewhere else. I don't want to, because I *really* like Red Hat's products. Always have (except perhaps 7.0). I'm just a little perplexed as to what each product can do for me (besides CPU/memory support) as far as server packages and support. I'm a guy that's used to digging this stuff up on his own, but their site, while generally very useful for support/documentation issues, sucks for product details. I don't want to, but I've had to start evaluating alternatives like Libranet/Debian. Come on Red Hat, let's go! Root, root, root! (I'd say "sudo, sudo, sudo", but you might confuse me with Phil Collins.) *rimshot* -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
