On Wednesday 29 October 2003 07:04 am, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 06:15, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:02:58PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > > Ok, allow me to pout for a moment. $349 a year for RHES? I hate to
> > > say it, but none of them (RHPW included) really sound like much of a
> > > bargain for the SOHO customer.
> > In the Linux market, only Suse offers 5 years support and I don't really
> > feel that it's a better deal than RH's offerings.
>
> Having never purchased SuSE support, I can't argue there. When it comes
> down to it, I'm really frustrated by the quantity/quality of information
> coming out of Red Hat with respect to their products. It seems they're
> being intentionally vague about patches, and worse, you get different
> answers from different people. I know this stuff has been argued on
> this list over the last month, but there's been a lot of misinformation
> sprinkled in with the facts. Their RHEL licensing/patching/RHN policies
> are lost on me right now.
<rant>
Seriously, what the heck is wrong with Redhat? This is all so confusing. If
they cant give us a good definite information on this stuff, how are we
suppose to decide what to use? I hope they're (Redhat) listening/monitoring
this list. There are to many incoherent and contradictory information, add to
that all the speculations.
I like RH product, and willing to pay their commercial product for reasonable
price if we can afford it, but all this confusion *is* ridiculous.
</rant>
RDB
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
---------------------------------------------------------
"To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy
something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy
Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional
side effect."
- Linus Torvalds -
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
