On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 06:15, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:02:58PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: > > > > Ok, allow me to pout for a moment. $349 a year for RHES? I hate to say > > it, but none of them (RHPW included) really sound like much of a bargain > > for the SOHO customer. > > Compared to what? > NT4 has been EOLed, W2K is going the way of the dodo and > W2K3 Server is $3999 . Well, if you want to compare against Microsoft offerings... Windows Small Business Server for $599. > In the Linux market, only Suse offers 5 years support and I don't really > feel that it's a better deal than RH's offerings. Having never purchased SuSE support, I can't argue there. When it comes down to it, I'm really frustrated by the quantity/quality of information coming out of Red Hat with respect to their products. It seems they're being intentionally vague about patches, and worse, you get different answers from different people. I know this stuff has been argued on this list over the last month, but there's been a lot of misinformation sprinkled in with the facts. Their RHEL licensing/patching/RHN policies are lost on me right now. -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
