Re: raid over ethernet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/29/2011 07:44 AM, Roberto Spadim wrote:
faster than nbd?

NBD is fast but has one problem: if you lose network connectivity for a while (tcp drops) there is no recovery I am aware of. I think it unmaps the disk until user intervention. Or this was the situation a couple of years ago.
Actually for RAID this might even be a good point, but keep it in mind.
iscsi seems an obvious alternative. And you can put anything under MD I think, but DRBD (without MD) is probably better because it's made exactly for that purpose.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux