RE: [PATCH 0/2] Release 3.2 summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil,

Thank you for applying last patches.
It seems that only two patches left to complete features planed for 3.2 release:
- imsm: Update metadata for second array
- imsm: FIX: not all disks are released in free_imsm_disks()

Please, apply them if they are meet your requirements.

After the 3.2 release we plan to submit to you next mdadm's features.
On Monday I will send you a draft plan our next steps related to mdadm (what and at what time we plan to submit)
I hope that this will improve our cooperation.

I would also mention that we expect that the kernel patches will be applied.

Regards
Krzysztof

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-raid-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neil Brown
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:26 AM
> To: Wojcik, Krzysztof
> Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Neubauer, Wojciech; Kwolek, Adam;
> Williams, Dan J; Ciechanowski, Ed
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Release 3.2 summary
> 
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:46:42 +0100
> Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Neil,
> >
> > Intel plans to include following features in mdadm-3.2 release:
> > - Array Auto Rebuild,
> > - Online Capacity Expansion,
> > - Takeover raid10->raid0,
> > - Takeover raid0->raid10,
> > - Takeover raid1->raid0
> >
> > They are almost incorporated into your repository and tested.
> > Some of patches are waiting for your acceptation and some will be
> send
> > today.
> > We're getting closer to the end of release and I would like to
> > summarize and explain what exactly needs to be done.
> >
> > To finish our features following patches have to be appyied:
> > mdadm:
> > - FIX: Meet SET_ARRAY_INFO ioctl requirements (this series)
> > - FIX: Remove disks in mdmon for external metadata (this series)
> > - WORKAROUND: mdadm hangs during reshape (PART #2)
> > - FIX: delta_disk can have UnSet value
> > - imsm: FIX: spare cannot be added (very imprtand fix- blocks many
> > tests)
> > - FIX: start_reshape status should be checked
> > - FIX: Container can be left frozen
> > - FIX: Array after takeover has to be frozen
> > - imsm: FIX: do not allow for container operation for the same disks
> > number
> > - imsm: Update metadata for second array
> > kernel:
> > - Add raid1->raid0 takeover support
> > - md/raid5: FIX: reshape on degraded devices has wrong configuration
> > - md: do not write resync checkpoint, if max_sector has beeen reached
> > - unblock the creation of an external metadata RAID if native one
> > exists
> >
> > Could you review patches above and eventually apply them, please?
> >
> > Besides "Assemble: allow to assemble spares on their own" patch has
> > to be discused and final solution has to be found.
> >
> > After all patches will be applyied we expect all planned featues will
> > be working and we can finish the 3.2 release. Of course we will
> > continue our testing after official release and new defects may be
> > discovered.
> >
> > And question for you. When do you plan to announce official 3.2
> > release? Can we assume that this will be at the beginning of next
> > week?
> 
> I think I have applied and pushed out all of the patches in my inbox
> that I can agree with or easily fix.  There are a few that raise real
> issues but that I am not happy with the approach.  And some that I
> don't agree with at all.  But as you say, most have been resolved.
> 
> One issue that hasn't been addressed much at all is restarting an array
> that is in the middle of a reshape.  I want to at least get that
> working for native arrays before I release 3.2.  Getting that working
> for external metadata will probably have to wait for 3.2.1.
> 
> I very much hope to release 3.2 on Monday.  I will announce it as a
> 'developer' release - it mostly works but needs lots of testing before
> anyone depends on it.
> 
> My minimum requirement for 3.2 is that the mdadm test suite passes.
> 
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
> 
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Krzysztof Wojcik (2):
> >       FIX: Remove disks in mdmon for external metadata
> >       FIX: Meet SET_ARRAY_INFO ioctl requirements
> >
> >
> >  Grow.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux