ouch, html. - my bad. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Denis <denismpa@xxxxxxxxx> Date: 2011/1/29 Subject: Re: raid over ethernet To: Alexander Schreiber <als@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux-RAID <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011/1/29 Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Manging the combination of nbd and mdraid is complicated. > > complicated = drbd work? I have been using drbd for a long time and it's quite easy to implement, manage and use. The main purpose of all aplications I have used it for, were high availibility and it works just fine. And it's really cool to se it integrated with heartbeat, which will manage to mount the partition on one or another node, according to your police and nodes availibility. 2011/1/29 Alexander Schreiber <als@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > plain disk performance for writes, while reads should be reasonably > close to the plain disk performance - drbd optimizes reads by just reading > from the local disk if it can. > However, I have not used it with active-active fashion. Have you? if yes, what is your overall experience? > > Kind regards, > Alex. > -- > "Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and > looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Cheers, -- Denis Anjos, www.versatushpc.com.br -- Denis Anjos, www.versatushpc.com.br -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
