Neil,
I am using 2.4.x(2.4.5 and 2.4.20) but I do not have "sync_page_io(" on
/drivers/md/md.c.
I am using RAID10, too. If it is critical I need to fix it.
Should I try this patch?
Thanks,
Bo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Brown" <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: "Scott Mcdermott" <smcdermott@questra.com>
Cc: <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: RAID 1+0 makes BUG in raid1.c, but 0+1 works?
> On Wednesday December 25, smcdermott@questra.com wrote:
> >
> > is there something I'm doing wrong or is this a bug? Should I not be
> > using RAID1+0 ? I just tried it with RAID0+1 instead and it seems to
> > work fine (although it's somewhat slower than I expected, and initial
> > sync goes 250K/s for some reason until I turn up the minimum). This
> > makes no sense to me as I thought that RAID devices were a block-level
> > abstraction...so why would 0+1 work but not 1+0 ?? I really dislike the
> > additional probability of second-disk failure in RAID0+1 over RAID1+0,
> > and the ridiculous resync times, and I don't like the slow write speed
> > of RAID5.
>
> It is a bug. Arguably, the bug is that the test and BUG() call are
> wrong, but the patch below is probably the perferred fix in a stable
> kernel.
>
> I always recommend raid1 or raid5 at the bottom, and raid0/linear/lvm
> on top of that.
>
> NeilBrown
>
> ----------- Diffstat output ------------
> ./drivers/md/md.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ ./drivers/md/md.c
> --- ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ 2002-12-17 15:20:57.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2003-01-02 11:05:20.000000000 +1100
> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static int sync_page_io(kdev_t dev, unsi
> init_buffer(&bh, bh_complete, &event);
> bh.b_rdev = dev;
> bh.b_rsector = sector;
> - bh.b_state = (1 << BH_Req) | (1 << BH_Mapped);
> + bh.b_state = (1 << BH_Req) | (1 << BH_Mapped) | (1 << BH_Locked);
> bh.b_size = size;
> bh.b_page = page;
> bh.b_reqnext = NULL;
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
