Re: RAID 1+0 makes BUG in raid1.c, but 0+1 works?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday January 3, bo@anthologysolutions.com wrote:
> Neil,
> 
> I am using 2.4.x(2.4.5  and 2.4.20) but I do not have "sync_page_io(" on
> /drivers/md/md.c.
> I am using RAID10, too. If it is critical I need to fix it.
> Should I try this patch?

No.  This patch is only relevant if you are using a 2.4.21-pre
kernel. 2.4.5 and 2.4.20 don't need it.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux