On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Eric Butera <eric.butera@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 12:53 -0500, Eric Butera wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Nathan Nobbe > >> > >> I was following the blog tutorial on cake and here's what I got from > >> hitting the post/index page: > >> > >> 081230 12:51:55 316 Connect root@localhost on > >> 316 Init DB cake > >> 316 Query SHOW TABLES FROM `cake` > >> 316 Query DESCRIBE `posts` > >> 316 Query SELECT `Post`.`id`, `Post`.`title`, > >> `Post`.`body`, `Post`.`created`, `Post`.`modified` FROM `posts` AS > >> `Post` WHERE 1 = 1 > >> 316 Quit > > > > A good framework will allow you to replace the introspection step with a > > static definition of the database table, thus easily bypassing the extra > > queries. Although, I can't fathom why they've requested all the tables. > > > > Cheers, > > Rob. > > -- > > http://www.interjinn.com > > Application and Templating Framework for PHP > > > > To be fair cake did "cache" the show tables/describe magically for a > few seconds if I sat there refreshing the page. :) > > I always generate my Gateways & VO's from table definitions & > hand-code any non-crud statements. I've never really dealt with this > stuff before but it is a little disheartening. I would rather take > the 5 minutes re-generating a few files for an updated table versus > infinite amounts of computer power wasted trying to just make it work. > which bodes really well for something like symphony, but im not sure how bulky the orm abstraction layer is. that could end up ruining it in the end.. -nathan
