At 3:42 PM -0500 12/12/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
> Yes, but what if my disorder was random? How could you prove it is random? Give me an example of something you can put into disorder that doesn't use the premise of order? For instance throwing a handful of sand into the air is expected to obey the establish laws of physics. These laws of physics suggest order in the universe even when we perceive disorder. Cheers, Rob.
Yes, but now we're getting back to artificial rules of the mind. We perceive the laws of physics to work a certain way because we have established rules as to how they should work. But, what happens when they don't work? Then we change the rules. We are now at string theory and things still remain disordered. All our efforts to put order to things still fall short.
Also, when we do change our rules, nature hasn't changed. Nature hasn't suddenly changed to our view, but rather we change our thinking to adapt to observation. And it's in those terms of observation that order and disorder of things comes about and not in nature.
Cheers, tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
