On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 13:21 -0500, tedd wrote: > At 11:00 AM -0500 12/12/07, Robert Cummings wrote: > >On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:15 -0500, Robert Cummings wrote: > >> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 09:00 -0500, tedd wrote: > >> > At 2:22 PM -0600 12/10/07, Jay Blanchard wrote: > >> > > > >> > >Without order there cannot be randomness. > >> > > >> > Without randomness, you wouldn't know what order was. > >> > >> You're random with disorder. > > > >That should have said "You're confusing random with disorder.". But > >maybe Tedd is also a bit random and disorderly ;) > > > >Cheers, > >Rob. > > Yes, but what if my disorder was random? How could you prove it is random? Give me an example of something you can put into disorder that doesn't use the premise of order? For instance throwing a handful of sand into the air is expected to obey the establish laws of physics. These laws of physics suggest order in the universe even when we perceive disorder. Cheers, Rob. -- ........................................................... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ........................................................... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
