At 11:37 AM -0400 4/14/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
Sure, but designers head the beck and call of paying customers. Just
like we coders do. Sometime you just can't win the argument with a
suit :)
I didn't know you wore a suit. :-)
---
BTW, why can't a browser window be pixel perfect?
What's "pixel perfect"?
---
The more interactive the web becomes, the more we see web applications
mimicking desktop solutions,
On that we agree -- however, desktop solutions are being influenced
by web and vice versa. This is a dynamic process where ideas, needs,
and solutions merge and continue to change.
But don't think that current desktop solutions are the end-all of all
application development. I remember when DOS types claimed that using
a mouse would never catch on. Everything is changing.
---
Regardless of whether you think the web should be used for these kinds
of applications is irrelevant, because others do think it can and should
be used in this way.
Nonsense. What he thinks, what I think, and what you think does
influence change. You certainly don't have all the answers and
neither do I, but our dialog, our practice, our methods, our post, do
provide direction and example. What's the point of this dialog anyway
-- to amuse ourselves? No offense, but I would rather be playing
Ghost Recon than debating this issue with you.
I do this because I believe that this is the "right" way to educate
and to give back for those who helped, and continue to help, me.
---
Throwing cups of water back into the ocean to
prevent the tide from coming in just doesn't work.
But, it sure helps to keep your boat afloat. :-)
Besides, what tide are you talking about, the css tide? Everyday, via
my attendance to the css-discuss list, I would estimate that there
are more people coming on board the css boat than choosing tables.
Cheers,
tedd
--
-------
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php