There is no point in discussing the relative merits of pre-digital and post-digital technology. They both can do things the other can't. And there are some things both can do -- with apparent differences in result. So what? All that can be said is " I like this and you like that." How long do we have to list the details of this and that?
-yoram
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Kostas Papakotas <clenchedteethphotography@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 15, 2014 3:45 AM, "Emily L. Ferguson" <elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I cannot imagine ever being held hostage to the color profile of a film designer again.
Thanks, but no thank you.
And don't even mention grain. Another item we were held hostage by.
Let it go. Film is dead. Even if you want to have whatever you imagine the look of film is/was, you don't need the burden of shooting with film to get it.My point of view is vastly different.I think we have misunderstood the term Multimedia in the new digital age.For me the emaning is not voice, and music, and video and iamges etc....For me it means Digial, Film, andf VHS, and Analog sound etc etc.ALL of them are tools in out creativity suitcase, and an handyman does not throw away his screwdrivers for shake of power-drivers
