at iso 50 my leaf 65s is pretty stellar. and I can put a nice film back on it as either back up or as needed. I think 80mp Phase might get close to the resolution ektar 100 from a medium format on a drum scanner. Just not really need in most commercial cases. they tired to up grade me. I was like Why? Magazines are dying and they don't need the resolution I have now. Some reason the 1d and f4 both went lower resolution. Better quality less noise, faster processing, less wasted data.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 13, 2013, at 1:53 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
So, by my standards, digital has been clearly higher quality than film
since at least 2003.You are overstating the case for ‘affordable’ digital - perhaps a PhaseOne 80MP back competes ($45k), but not anything made by Nikon or Canon. And gigapixel? If you have any time constraints during a shot, it is useless.art for cars: panowraps.com
Art FaulThe Artist Formerly Known as Prints------Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.comGreens: http://www.inkjetprince.comCamera Works - The Washington Post.
