Re: Foul Fowl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




I have read more than a few comments about the gallery here which suggested that either due to a lack of interest or commentary, the gallery has become moribund. Considering how much digital photography suffers from a lack of the 7P’s (Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss-Poor Performance) shown here and elsewhere it’s not surprising. I will do my best to contribute both commentary and photographs as is possible. I will endeavor to put up images not previously seen on the web in hopes that those who wish to have their day in court with my images can make some pithy or illuminating commentary which should be published someplace.
 

Jan


On Aug 17, 2012, at 12:25 PM, John Palcewski wrote:

I alluded to this before, but you may pick any subject, large or
small, or any piece of artwork, or any novel, or any movie, or piece
of music, and you will invariably get divided, polarized opinions,
both vehemently for and strongly against.   So it's hardly a shocking
surprise that you disagree with my humorous view of what Jan is
doing--or trying to do--on the list.

On 8/17/12, Pini Vollach <pinimage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In spite of the history, I do not agree here.

Pini



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Palcewski
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 5:34 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Foul Fowl

Jan appears to be struggling mightily to earn himself the title of the Most
Foul Fowl!






[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux