This was the type of "interference" that was machine independent, because it didn't actually come from the machine of the supposed sender. Stephen --- On Sat, 12/4/10, Dan Mitchell <danmdan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
This was the type of "interference" that was machine independent, because it didn't actually come from the machine of the supposed sender. Stephen --- On Sat, 12/4/10, Dan Mitchell <danmdan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|