Re: Shooting greeting cards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Shooting greeting cards
From: ADavidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:53:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <p06240801c68e32c6f119@[192.168.1.46]>
Organization: School of Photographic Arts and Sciences/RIT
References: <c9d.482a6081.3797530f@xxxxxxx> <004d01ca0a6c$e80a1100$0f00010a@LAN> <4A687C40.2060902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <EAD6F36F8B8A124FB32D722A828211FD09DC57CB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p06240801c68e32c6f119@[192.168.1.46]>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2

Now I think this is a great suggestion!

As for Ken's quip: triangluar of course! ;)

andy


Emily L. Ferguson wrote:

Why not just scan them on a flatbed scanner.

References:
- Re: NYU researchers create 'invisible flash;' takes photos without glare
  - From: PhotoRoy6
- Re: NYU researchers create 'invisible flash;' takes photos without glare
  - From: karl shah-jenner
- Shooting greeting cards
  - From: Elson T. Elizaga
- RE: Shooting greeting cards
  - From: Edwin Blenkinsopp
- RE: Shooting greeting cards
  - From: Emily L. Ferguson

Prev by Date: Re: Shooting greeting cards
Next by Date: Re: Shooting greeting cards
Previous by thread: RE: Shooting greeting cards
Next by thread: Re: Shooting greeting cards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux