Re: Creative Commons, not Digital/Film costs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Emily L. Ferguson writes

: I dunno.  That's just a start and it makes $10K seem kinda reasonable to me.


: Digital is no less costly than film, put I really prefer the 
: flexibility of color correction which digital permits.  So I doubt 
: I'd ever go back to film.


that's a fair statement!  

film will always be a lot more demanding



(harder to CC on flickr too ;)

k




[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux