> For my part, well, that's one more person's work won't be wasting any > time over. Oops ... Perhaps I could have phrased all that a little better. I'm afraid there was a knee-jerk reaction to having my well intended and honest comments thrown back in my face. To bring it back into context: my comments on Dan's image were: "Nude, not particularly erotic but not too natural (in a believable sense) either. Don't get me wrong, I like the picture. There is something uncomfortable about the posture though (or maybe that's my old rugger injuries talking). Thanks for showing ... I'm still thinking about this one." Frankly I stand by them all and I still can't see what upset Dan so much. I'm sorry I couldn't run to two paragraphs of pseudo-intellectualisation about the deeper meanings and symbolic imagery of a nude bird squatting in the forest in full view of a bloke with a camera. 1) I'm not paid for my time 2) I'm not a artist. As for my last post. Forget it all. But at least now that I know you have no respect for my comments you won't be missing them next time. Bob PS ":I'm still thinking about this one." means exactly what it said.
