> So their CRAP rating is.......? Well, any one of them in the PF gallery would get a rave review from me. Looking at them again I can begin to understand ... Content - Good Reaction - Good (They certainly were memorable) Aesthetic - Very good (They exhibit a distinctive personal style) Practical - Very good (as I said, no "structural" or technical flaws I can see) It's nice to visit a site where I don't get the impression I'm seeing a rehash of others work. They're still not pictures I would want on my wall, but they have a subtlety missing from most proponents of digital manipulation. They leave the viewer in slight doubt as to what has been done without making the effect, well, the whole story. Two picture from "Village of the Damned": http://efimera.org/img/damned.jpg http://www.scifilm.org/images2/villagedamned1.jpg Bob
