However, I've found with the 10D that I can get almost identical results in "normal" lighting conditions, including manipulation. Most of the benefits of 16 bits get lost in typical output.
At 03:50 PM 9/14/2004, James B. Davis wrote:
I've tried JPG a few times, always with disappointment at the results. I you're happy with inferior images, or like the sports guys you mention you must shoot JPG, then go ahead and shoot JPG.
I shoot JPG if I'm shooting for the web, otherwise I use Capture One and RAW always. I like having a big, fat 16 bit range of tones to manipulate. Never met an image that didn't get better with manipulation. (tweaking)
-- Jim Davis, Nature Photography http://jimdavis.oberro.com/ Standard Poodles for fun BMW motorcycle for pleasure
Jeff Spirer
Photos: http://www.spirer.com
One People: http://www.onepeople.com/
Surfaces and Marks: http://www.withoutgrass.com