At 2004-09-05, 14:20:33 Jeff Spirer (jeff@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: >At 07:32 PM 9/4/2004, Bob Rosen wrote: >>My normal practice is to take each image in the gallery, print it, scan it >>at high resolution, print it again, photograph it, and get it printed to >>poster size before framing it, taking it to an art gallery and >>surreptitiously swapping it for something hanging on the walls there. >>This allows me to view it as the author intended. Only then can I give it >>the review it deserves... > >If I remember correctly, you used to give a rating of QF (quality factor) >or something like that, to indicate some ephemeral and inherent, yet >completely incomprehensible and numerically arbitrary, quality of the >image. Maybe you could bring that back. > > >Jeff Spirer > that sounds so much like photographer's statement... ___ END OF QUOTED TEXT ___
