In the States, mothers sue their children all the time.
Chris <nimbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris <nimbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The copyright in this case would be held by the subject of the portrait
(unless she signed a model release form) so it will now be in the hands of
her oldest descendant, in the absence of a will, and that is Mum (91).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> wildimages@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 09 June 2004 08:42
> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
> Subject: Gallery of 2004-06-05
>
>
> Some quick thoughts ... can't do much as telephone line kaput at home.
>
>
>
>
>
> C J R Strevens
> "The author of this photograph is an Unknown Professional"
>
> Well, copyright is life + 70y (or in perpetuity if Disney get their way).
> There is a good chance this is still covered so should it be shown here?
>
> 1899? Imagine how much clearer it would have been from an inkjet.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
"The optimist believes this is the best of all possible worlds.
The pessimist fears it's true" - J Robert Oppenheimer
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
