Re: Numbering Prints

[Norman Ford <njford@netvigator.com>]

 Its quite unusual for any photographer to make an edition of 250. A 
silkscreen printmaker perhaps, but a b/w photographer working on silver 
print - not very likely. An edition of this size would also 
significantly reduce the value of the image.

Mike King wrote:

> It's been my experience that artists that make numbered series actually
> produce more prints of any single photograph than those that do not number.
> And unlike print making there's a huge burn out factor in producing an
> edition of 250 photographs.  I'd really be hating that shot by the time
> number 250 is produced.  Additionally, and just my opinion,  it not really a
> series unless it's produced in one session, easy for a print maker
> impossible in the darkroom.
>
> darkroommike
>
> ----------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darryl Gage" <dgage@localnet.com>
> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
> <photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 7:18 PM
> Subject: Numbering Prints
>
>
>  
>
> > Let's say I create prints from the same original negative in silver
> >    
> gelatin,
>  
>
> > platinum, and gum bichromate.  Would each of these categories constitute a
> > different series or should they all be grouped together as one series?  Or
> > should I just count myself lucky if I sell anything and not worry about
> > numbering the prints?  Thanks.
> >
> > Darryl M. Gage
> > Forestville, NY
> >
> > "Strange and beautiful are the stars tonight..."  Blue Rodeo
> >
> >    
>
>
>  

--
Norman Jackson Ford -
PhD (ABD)
Dept. of Comparative Literature (and Cultural Studies),
University of Hong Kong

Visiting Lecturer,
School of Design,
Hong Kong Polytechnic University