> The number is not a date, but > a progressive upcount. It's 00 01 13. Elson Where it is located most here would have cloned it away in PS anyhow. > I'm not sure if revealing the whole face would amount to > anything. But here is number 00 01 14: Actually, I like this much less. OK, it has the same technical quality, but it lacks the "operating room" atmosphere. Oh, I prefer the style of the copyright notice on the second image: it is less visually intrusive but still does its job. Bob http://www.stabbs.org/nature/intro.htm
