Qkano says:
> ... speaks for itself. I can't help but be in awe of the technical
> expertees needed to carry this off (nor the 500 rounds of ammunition).
Actually only a few shots were fired since there is no guess work as to
placement of bullet nor accuracy of shot. Placement of debris is something
else.
> wrong. The cloud of dust gives the appearance of movement yet the
> bullet looks uncomfortably static. If you repeat this shot how about
> using two flashes? One slightly slower (1/100,000th) to give a motion
> trail and the main one *second curtained* as show to catch the bullet.
OK ... will do.
> I keep wondering how long it will be till RIT close down the gallery
> because its staff appear to be exclusively female. In today's age I
> wonder if such overt sexism can continue to survive unchallenged ...
It must be Andy's magnetic personality.
> > There is currently one (1) photograph by Vasconcellos enqueued
> > awaiting future exhibition.
> ? How can that be ... surely we don't send in our next shot till the
> previous one appears ;o)
According to the staff it can be because the announcement went out a few
minutes after the exhibit went up and in those few minutes Jose had already
sent in his contribution for the following week.
adios,
Andy
