> I tried this scenario using edb's 13.3 x64 install: > > postgres=# select version(); > version > ------------------------------------------------------------ > PostgreSQL 13.3, compiled by Visual C++ build 1914, 64-bit > (1 row) > > > postgres=# \l postgres > List of databases > Name | Owner | Encoding | Collate | Ctype | Access privileges > ----------+----------+----------+---------+-------+------------------- > postgres | postgres | UTF8 | C | C | > (1 row) > > postgres=# explain (analyze,buffers,COSTS,TIMING) postgres-# select > MAX(toFloat(a, null)) as "a" from sampletest; > QUERY PLAN > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------- > Aggregate (cost=2137.00..2137.01 rows=1 width=4) (actual > time=44962.279..44962.280 rows=1 loops=1) > Buffers: shared hit=657 > -> Seq Scan on sampletest (cost=0.00..1637.00 rows=100000 > width=15) (actual time=0.009..8.900 rows=100000 loops=1) > Buffers: shared hit=637 > Planning: > Buffers: shared hit=78 > Planning Time: 0.531 ms > Execution Time: 44963.747 ms > (8 rows) > > and with locally compiled REL_13_STABLE's head on the same machine: > > rjuju=# select version(); > version > ------------------------------------------------------------ > PostgreSQL 13.4, compiled by Visual C++ build 1929, 64-bit > (1 row) > > rjuju=# \l rjuju > List of databases Name | Owner | Encoding | Collate | > Ctype | Access privileges > -------+-------+----------+---------+-------+------------------- > rjuju | rjuju | UTF8 | C | C | > (1 row) > > rjuju-# select MAX(toFloat(a, null)) as "a" from sampletest; > QUERY PLAN > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------ > Aggregate (cost=1477.84..1477.85 rows=1 width=4) (actual > time=460.334..460.334 rows=1 loops=1) > Buffers: shared hit=646 read=1 > -> Seq Scan on sampletest (cost=0.00..1197.56 rows=56056 > width=32) (actual time=0.010..7.612 rows=100000 loops=1) > Buffers: shared hit=637 > Planning: > Buffers: shared hit=20 read=1 > Planning Time: 0.125 ms > Execution Time: 460.527 ms > (8 rows) > > Note that I followed [1], so I simply used "build" and "install". I have no > idea what is done by default and if NLS is included or not. > > So if default build on windows has NLS included, it probably means that > either there's something specific on edb's build (I have no idea how their > build is produced) or their version of msvc is responsible for that. > > [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/install-windows- > full.html#id-1.6.4.8.10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, So you are seeing a 100x difference. > Execution Time: 44963.747 ms > Execution Time: 460.527 ms I see on https://www.postgresql.org/download/ that there is a different installer from 2ndQuadrant. I am going to try that one and see what I come up with. Are there any other "standard" distros of Postgres that I could try out? Additionally, is there a DLL or EXE file that you could make available to me that I could simply patch on my current install and see if it makes any difference? Or a zip of the lib/bin folders? I found out I could download Visual Studio community edition so I am trying this, but may not have the time to get through a build any time soon as per my unfamiliarity with the process. I'll follow Ranier's steps and see if that gets me somewhere. Thank you, Laurent.